PMTA - S1 E1

2. Classified Evidence

Marcel is reprimanded for the move she made and buys herself an enemy.

3. Monkeys

The pressure around the mortgage curfew is mounting, and Marcel is being attacked and removed from the portfolio. Despite this she manages to bring new and unexpected testimony.

4. Corroborating Evidence

Following the testimony Marcel is appointed to lead the case. The interns are trying to establish the state committee's version. The identity of the crook who committed the mortgage fraud is revealed.

5. Extradition

The hunt for the mortgage fraud suspect is leading to surprising developments in the investigation.

6. Abuse of Power

Marcel receives new information regarding the mortgage portfolio but has difficulty reopening it.

7. Established Fact

The investigation into the Violin of David brings Marcel to a series of disturbing revelations.

8. Conflict of Interest

The "Violin of David" affair is published, the connection between Nachmias and Bergman is revealed and causes a stir in the State Attorney's Office. Kobi is released under house arrest in Marcel's apartment.

9. House Arrest

Marcel is trying to link Bergman to the murder of a Jerusalemite, even though the evidence points to Gilbert Atias.

10. Self-Representation

Following the arson of his vehicle at the police facility where he was being held, Murdoch initiates an unusual legal proceeding against Kobe and seeks to represent himself.

11. Classified

Meir Kalfon was arrested but refuses to cooperate in the investigation on the grounds that he acted in the course of his job. Kaminski ran into a conflict of interest in representing his clients.

12. Reasonable Doubt

Kaminsky realizes he has gotten involved and is looking for a way to break free from representation. The interns reveal a critical detail for the investigation. Marcel tries to lead a move but is unexpectedly blocked.

13. The Burden of Proof

The explosion of the explosive device placed on Marcel's motorcycle carries a heavy price. Is Murdoch responsible for placing the charge? Or is the person behind the mortgage scam responsible for liquidation?